Faculty committees and student representation

Samantha Cooper

News Editor

The student government at Goucher recently was re-named and re-organized into the Goucher Student Government (GSG). While the reaction to the new government has been mixed, it’s important to note that it is made up of many committees, each with its own purpose, and the majority of which most students are unaware of. Many of the committees are made up of both staff and student members who strive to do what they believe is best for Goucher College.

One of the committees is the Faculty Committee, which is comprised of two smaller committees: the Academic Policy Committee and the Curriculum Committee. The Academic Policy Committee deals with anything to do with admissions, financial aid, class schedules, and records, though according to Chair of Faculty Committee, Scott Sibley, the committee has been focusing on “schedules and credit loads.” The Curriculum Committee is responsible for “approving new courses, changes to existing majors, minors and programs, proposals for new majors,” according to Provost Marc Roy, who is one of the staff members of the Curriculum Committee. The Committee is also responsible for approving courses for L.E.R. requirements that aren’t taken at Goucher that may not be a clear substitute. This is particularly true for students who are trying to fulfill L.E.R. while they are studying abroad.

The Academic Policies Committee has eight members and currently doesn’t have any students serving, but normally has two student representatives. The Curriculum Committee has nine members, two of which are student members. This year, the serving students are Samuel Kessler ’16 and Hannah Painter ’17. Kessler has served on the committee since his freshman year, while this is Painter’s first year on the committee. Last year, Kessler was the only representative.

Students on the committees used to be chosen by the SGA, but since the change in the government, there seems to have been issues in finding new students. Kessler explained that he personally selected Painter to be the second student on the committee, as he is going abroad next semester and did not want to leave the committee without a student representative. “I would love for all committees to be as diverse as possible. I picked somebody as different from me as I could,” Kessler explained. Painter, is indeed his opposite. Kessler is a male, humanities student in his junior year while Painter is a female math major in her sophomore year. He also chose her, also because he wanted to be able to represent as many student views at Goucher as he could.

GSG has not been as proactive in finding students to cover the spots in the committees as the former SGA had. According to Kessler, the SGA sent out an e-mail during his freshman year asking any interested students to send an email. This year, no such e-mail was sent out, so Kessler had to do it on his own.
Painter wasn’t aware of the committee’s existence until Kessler told her about the open position, but she said, “it was really cool to be involved” with the staff on the committee. She talked about her very first meeting where one of the topics of discussion was adding a new class to the curriculum, whether it was a good idea to add more classes, and if it was necessary.

Information on the committees is rather difficult to find. The single website dedicated to the committees is outdated, and the staff members of the committee didn’t know about who the students on the committee were. The names of the faculty members on the committees were difficult to find as well. A student who is curious about how the college works would be hard-pressed to find information on them without e-mailing several staff members and members of the GSG.

When asked why they thought this, Kessler said, “The only reason for students to know about this [the Curriculum Committee] is for them to know about the L.E.R. they need fulfilled. Sibley said he believed it simply wasn’t a thing that crosses many students’ minds, “When I was a student, I had no idea of the faculty committees at my schools too.”

Roy agreed with the statement and stated that “It wasn’t part of my life.” All involved would like to see more students getting involved with the committees as the suggestions would help them decide what students at Goucher would like and need most.

Both faculty members would also like students to know that professors are required to be on a committee and they all take their roles “very seriously.” Roy, is on several of the committees at Goucher including the Budget-Planning Committee, the Faculty Committee and has a representative on the Academic Policies Committee. Sibley is also the chair on the Faculty Committee.

Scoop’s Corner: “Legend of Korra”

Samantha Cooper

News Editor

I’m a huge fan of the television show “The Legend of Korra” and since the fourth (and final) season recently premiered, it seems only appropriate to discuss the first episode appropriately titled, “After All These Years.” The last season left off with the main character, Korra, more or less incapacitated, and despite there being a three year time skip, she doesn’t show up until the last few minutes of the episode. It seems as though this first episode was designed to more or less set up the conflicts and events for the rest of the season. I don’t totally mind, especially since we already get to see this season’s villain, Kuvira, in full-force.

Though we got a glimpse of her last season, we didn’t truly didn’t get to see the extant of Kuvira’s abilities. Within ten seconds of her first scene in this season, we get to see her take down about a dozen people without even breaking a sweat. Also within the three years, she’s managed to basically
take over an entire Earth Kingdom continent, and is called the Great Uniter. I can’t wait to see more of her.
Other characters have changed a lot as well. Bolin, for example, has joined Kuvira, but seems to believe he’s doing the right thing. He still retains his total goofball personality. Another character, Mako, has become the bodyguard of the future Earth King. The other main female character, Asami, has created a rail-line that connects the city she lives in, Republic City, to the rest of the Earth Kingdom.

Korra has been lying to both her friends and family and has been secretly fighting in underground rings, all while keeping it secret that she’s actually the Avatar. I was disappointed that we didn’t get to see more of her, but hopefully there will be more of Korra in the next episode.
Other than the limited screen time for Korra, it was an excellent episode. I’m super excited for next week, and I don’t even know the name of the next episode. I’m just hoping it won’t leave me an emotional wreck because I’m currently in the midst of a total homework over load at the moment. I wouldn’t be able to deal. Anyone who has been in a fandom knows exactly what I’m talking about. I can’t wait.

Unfortunately, I have to vary my topics in this column and next will probably focus on another issue, so unless there’s a riot, an episode with an emotionally traumatizing moment or one that’s just plain totally awesome, I’ll only make passing references to “The Legend of Korra” in future columns.

Goucher debuts the Video Application

Samantha Cooper

News Editor

On September 4, Goucher College launched the Goucher Video Application, which will allow the future Class of 2019 to send a two-minute video describing how they see themselves flourishing at the college. Rather than asking for grades or test scores, students will only be required to submit two pieces of high school work: a graded essay and a second piece of work of the student’s choosing: an art project, short story, lab report or dance performance.

The essay will assess a potential student’s writing ability to see if they can craft and defend a thesis, and whether or not their writing skills are up to the Goucher’s standards. The second piece of work will be analyzed by a staff member who is a professional in that area; a student who sends in a short story, for example, will have their work analyzed by somebody in the English department, while a student who sends in a copy of a lab report will have their work looked over by somebody from the Chemistry department.

“We’ve always taken a holistic to approach to the way we review applications… So this is another way for the college to commit themselves to taking that holistic approach,” Admissions Counselor Chris Wild said. Wild helped to spearhead the campaign, which was created by President Jose Bowen. “The key for us was to ensure this is an accessible application. As much as it is about reaching students, it’s also about accessibility to higher education…So we wanted to be very, very, very clear that the video itself was not about production quality.”

The videos will be judged on three factors by a committee of staff members: Content and thoughtfulness, structure and organization, and clarity and effectiveness. The first section is worth ten points, while the second two are worth five points each. While the videos will not be judged on production values, there are still a few guidelines that need to be followed. The video must be no more two minutes long and begin with the student standing in front of the camera stating their name and where they are from. Students must describe how they see themselves thriving at Goucher College. The videos must then be uploaded to Goucher’s Slideroom.com site where they will be evaluated once all materials are submitted.

The new application is the creation of President Jose Bowen who introduced it as a way to demystify the college application process, as well as to make it more accessible to a greater variety of students. “We know that video is an incredibly popular and important new form of communication. Students may feel more comfortable with this but it’s also something students will need to do in the future,” Bowen said in a video explaining the new application. “We’re doing this because higher education should be about potential and not about privilege.”

Bowen hopes that the Video Application will appeal to students from lower-income families who may not have been given the same opportunities during childhood and may not know about selective liberal arts schools like Goucher. He cited a statistic that said students whose families are in the bottom quartile for household income only have an 8% chance of graduating from college, while somebody from the top quartile has a 73% chance of graduating.

He also discussed research done by Stanford professor, Caroline Hoxby. Hoxby’s research revealed that every year there are thirty to forty thousand high school seniors who have the grades and/or the test scores to get into college, even a selective liberal arts one like Goucher, who do not apply anywhere. This is because they do not know about colleges like Goucher, or believe they cannot afford them or they apply to community colleges, or colleges with open enrollment

Bowen also believes that the Video Application will appeal to students who have the grades to get into college, but may think otherwise. “They don’t understand how to look at a transcript,” he said, “I know that if you have a C in algebra, it’s one C and it’s not a big deal. When we unrolled the Video App, we got letter after letter after letter from high school teachers saying ‘I have students who don’t understand that a B in my class doesn’t mean they can’t go to college.’”

Wild, on the hand, believes that the Video Application will appeal to “more creative students,” who will use the Video as a way to exhibit their artistic abilities, or to students who are better orators than essay writers.

Both believe that the new application will help students confused by the process and will help even out the playing field between students from different economic classes. Students who may have not been given equal opportunities during their lifetime and might have been given certain advantages would be relatively indistinguishable if they both sent in a Video Application.

“We’re not lowering standards. We’re making it easier to apply. We’re making it easier to start a conversation,” Bowen said during an interview. He cited his own experience as a high school senior, where he was given an application to the local city college, which was open enrollment, despite being the valedictorian of his class. It was only because his mother decided to go the school, yell at the admissions counselor and grab the first application she saw and made him fill it out.

Many students don’t have parents like Bowen and so, wouldn’t even have the opportunity he did. Another reason that these students may not apply to schools, especially ones like Goucher is that they believe they can’t afford it. Sixty percent of American citizens don’t know that private schools offer financial aid, and therefore don’t apply.

Students who apply via the Video Application are still eligible for both need-based and merit-based scholarships. Students who want a need based scholarships will need to fill out all the necessary forms in order to be eligible. Students who want to receive merit-based scholarships will need to submit their transcripts, but their admittance to Goucher will not be based on those grades.

The reactions from the press and general public have been mixed;  one Twitter user by the handle @Josh_Hylton21 wrote, “I don’t know what or where you are Goucher College but you caught my attention.” Some news sources like The Baltimore Sun have lauded Goucher for creating a “novel way for cell-phone savvy teenagers” to apply to college,” while others have criticized it, calling it the “Selfie-Video” and have compared it to the application video Elle Woods made in the movie Legally Blonde.

Many who have criticized the Video Application are especially concerned that Goucher won’t be able to properly assess the videos, and will end up admitting unqualified students therefore lowering the quality and standards of the school. Some have pointed out the opening to the video announcement, where a student tears up a high school transcript, may send the wrong message.

“We probably could have chosen a different image. But it generated a lot of publicity; some of it negative, some of it positive. If we had taken a gentler approach, we might not have gotten that attention,” Bowen said.

The responses from Goucher faculty have been mainly positive. Several faculty members who helped with the creation of the Video Application have posted videos on the Goucher website showing their support including Nina Kasinunas, Scott Sibley, and Eric Singer.

“I’m really excited about Goucher’s Video Application. We’re a liberal arts college here at Goucher. We emphasize the whole student…It makes perfect sense to me that we should allow them an alternative to use a video to apply for college,” said Dr. Nina Kasinunas, from the Political Science department.

“We want students who are strong, obviously, but many students at Goucher have strong second interests…During the video the student can talk about how they’ll fit in as whole person here. I think that’s something we’re looking forward to seeing the video,” said Dr. Scott Sibley, a Chemistry professor.

Many of the concerns about the new application within the school appeared to come from students. Sophomore transfer student Noah Kahan said, “If you don’t require transcripts and you ask people to take videos. It makes it so that you may be getting less intelligent people than if you actually asked for a transcript. It might lower the school’s level of rigor.”

Other students voiced their concerns during the open-forum assembly held on September 17. They expressed concern that the application would admit students who weren’t academically prepared for Goucher and would lower the value of their degrees.

Some also expressed that they felt the Video Application was simply a way to increase enrollment and recognition of the school, and that it appeared to be more of a publicity stunt than anything else.

Bowen admitted there were some drawbacks to the Video Application during a live-stream information session that was also held on September 17. “We’re trying something new. One of the pitfalls is that we can see people. There’s a potential bias in the system. You can’t unsee a glitzy video,” he said.

During an interview, he emphasized that the launch of the Application wasn’t a way to increase enrollment and that it has the potential to change the college admissions process forever. “If it works, and…it’s easy to identify potential. If I am able to say these five students are going to succeed here and those five students all graduate then every school in the country will do this.”

Eleven students have already started the process but have not sent in their videos yet. Accepted students who decide to enroll may be asked for their transcripts so that they can be tracked alongside their peers who applied in the traditional manner. It will be impossible to tell how well the Video Application works until the students accepted through the Application have been at Goucher for at least a year. Either way, Bowen believes the Application is a good risk to take; “More ideas are killed by doubt than failure,” he said, “You don’t not do something because it might fail.”

Scoop’s Corner: advice to freshmen

Samantha Cooper

News Editor

Now that the first month of college is up, I thought it would be a good time to give advice to the freshmen. This is partially because I can’t think of another topic and partially because there are a few things I had to learn the hard way, and I don’t want anyone else going through what I had to endure. So here’s “How to Survive Your Freshman Year (And The Rest) Relatively Unscathed:”

Read more of this post

Scoop’s Corner: “The Giver”

Samantha Cooper

News Editor

Most of you have probably read the book, “The Giver.” It’s the children’s version of “1984,” and “Brave New World,” and the predecessor of all Young Adult dystopia novels. Which are apparently a huge thing right now, and I wouldn’t mind if there weren’t so many love triangles! It’s getting ridiculous…

  The book version of “The Giver” had the slightest tinge of a romance, in that 12-year old Jonas develops a crush on his friend Fiona, but these are promptly eliminated with pills designed to take care of that issue. The book is mainly about a boy realizing that everything that he knew is wrong; there is a thing called color, another called music and in the time before there were Communities, people lived with their biological parents and siblings, and they felt things: both good and bad. Jonas learns about all these things from the Receiver of Memory, who he calls the Giver, because he is being trained to take his place. It’s an amazing book, full of symbolism and emotion. It’s terrible to see Jonas go through so much and make such difficult decisions, especially at such a young age.

The movie ages Jonas up to about sixteen, and has him played by a twenty-three year old (I get it. You’ll get more people if he’s hot but other than that, why?)

This makes all his actions seem more ridiculous, and idiotic in the film.

It also makes his feelings towards his friend Fiona more intense, and a bit odd especially considering that most of the time, she really doesn’t know what he’s doing. The concept of kissing and affection is absolutely foreign to her.

  The movie also changes around some of the most basic plot points of the novel, in  order to make it more “action-oriented.”

The action happens in the last third of the movie, and seems to exist only to make the movie more marketable to the “tween/young teen” crowd.

For example, in the novels, pills are distributed only to block out romantic feelings while in the movie injections are given to all citizens in order to block all emotions.

  There are other book-to-movie differences: the movie incorporated an unneeded villain, the Chief Elder, whose only goal was to stop Jonas, while in the book, the Giver (and therefore Jonas) was always contacted by the Elders before they made any major decisions and that the identifying “Giver” mark was changed from light eyes to a birth mark.

If you would like to compare the two, read the book and go out to see the movie. You will see major differences. While I understand that books and movies are two different mediums, I feel as though they could have tried harder with “The Giver,” especially since they’ve been working on a film adaptation for ages. It’s disappointing to wait for so many years, only to get a movie that won’t even be remembered by next summer. Percy Jackson fans, I now know how you feel…I never want to go through this kind of pain again.

OIS announces new study abroad policies

Samantha Cooper

News Editor

On August 19th the Interim Associate Provost for International Studies, Eric Singer, sent out an email to all staff members regarding a change to the voucher system for study abroad programs. The changes will begin with this year’s freshmen, who, rather than receiving the standard $1200 voucher will need to apply for the Goucher Global Grant. This new grant will allow financially disadvantaged students to apply for up to $2500, which will be used to cover travel expenses.

The grant is the creation of Singer, Provost Marc Roy and President José Bowen. Roy said, “The vouchers had a built-in unfairness. The system should be a more fair system.” He explained that the original voucher system was designed to cover the price of travel, regardless of where a student was going or their economic status. The new system, in his words, is “a more equitable arrangement.”

Singer emphasized that Goucher was neither cutting the study abroad requirement, nor was it cutting any programs. He also said there were talks about changing the program last year, but “no specific policy” was actually discussed. When asked whether the changes had anything to do with current economic issues, Singer said, “Everything has to do with economic issues… It would be irresponsible not to notice. The college as a whole requires us to pay attention to the bottom line.”

Roy also bought up economic issues as one of the contributing factors to the change. He also said, “The college is always looking to make study abroad costs as low as possible.” However, there would not be huge difference between the amount of money Goucher currently spends on study abroad and the amount it will spend.  He added that it would be hard to tell how the new system will work out until this year’s current freshmen go abroad in their junior or senior year. “We can always change it,” he added, “We’ll figure out what went wrong and what needs to be adjusted.”

“Our hope is that it won’t have a negative effect,” Singer said. “There will be less of a hardship for families that have financial need issues.

The application process will not be difficult. A student will need to simply check off a box when filling out their study abroad forms and the Financial Aid Office will help determine if they qualify and if so, how much. Students who choose to study abroad in non-traditional countries will have a better chance of receiving grant money. Non-traditional countries are any countries outside of Europe. Students in the U.S. and at Goucher tend to gravitate towards programs in countries like England, Spain and France.

Singer said, “These countries are closest to America, culturally and academically. We are trying to highlight other countries.” Students who choose to study in Europe, however, will not be penalized.

Goucher remains the only school the United States that requires all students to study abroad. The school offers over sixty programs in thirty-two countries and six continents. Some of the countries are: England, France, Spain, Italy, Norway, Argentina, China, Serbia, Ghana and Russia. Besides semester-long programs, Goucher also offers Intensive Courses Abroad, (ICA) which last around three weeks, and which change from year to year depending on the cost and the number of students interested. This year, Goucher added two new ICAs: one in Amsterdam and another that goes to Japan and Taiwan.

Take Back the Night returns to Goucher, raises awareness

Samantha Cooper
News Editor

On Thursday, April 24 a group of students gathered in the Pearlstone Atrium for Goucher’s annual Take Back the Night event, where victims of sexual assault spoke about their experiences to others. Events like the one at Goucher take place all over the country, many at college campuses, and each does the event differently. The event typically includes a march and an opportunity for victims to speak out.
Read more of this post


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 676 other followers